Rollbar pics

greg73cuda said:
hey ron. beers soon enough eh! how did you connect your frame. its been so long since i've been under a B i can't picture the frame. any pics

greg73cuda

Beers sound good Greg ! [smilie=a: Here's some pics of the frame connecter attatching points:


[url]http://www.freepichosting.com/Albums/421580473/23.html[/url]
http://www.freepichosting.com/Albums/421580473/24.html

No Autorama...guess maybe that's not bad news given the quality of the show.... [smilie=e:


Ron

Ps. There are some smallblocks available locally...i believe they're early-mid 70's vintage...360ci. Your bud Ian had them advertised awhile back....
 
FF3931, do you find that you lose any rigidity by using the smaller tubing that doesn't intrude on the floorpans at all? I've done a couple of sets, particularly one on a friend's Demon, where the floor was notched... not as attractive as yours from an interior standpoint, but they were welded to the floor for about 15", and the rear anchor area laid inside the frame rail by about 6". They were the most effective frame ties I've seen so far--using a bumper jack would get 3 tires off the ground. [smilie=e: I've never done a low-profile set like that... but then again, nothing I've done was caged, either. Maybe it's just more important to use larger tubing (and more tie-in) with a car that's not going to be caged... thoughts?
 
Makes sense to me, the last big block challenger I owned had a weak frame that was so bad the steering wheel would change position after a hard launch. Got pretty squirrely through the traps but all you had to do was dump the clutch a few times in reverse on the return road and it was fine again. Frame ties are a must if you like side stepping the clutch.
 
Dr.Jass said:
FF3931, do you find that you lose any rigidity by using the smaller tubing that doesn't intrude on the floorpans at all? I've done a couple of sets, particularly one on a friend's Demon, where the floor was notched... not as attractive as yours from an interior standpoint, but they were welded to the floor for about 15", and the rear anchor area laid inside the frame rail by about 6". They were the most effective frame ties I've seen so far--using a bumper jack would get 3 tires off the ground. [smilie=e: I've never done a low-profile set like that... but then again, nothing I've done was caged, either. Maybe it's just more important to use larger tubing (and more tie-in) with a car that's not going to be caged... thoughts?[/quote]

Jass, i looked at a lot of options and the weld in (floorpan)style was one of them. The frames/floorpans are very solid on this car...it was pretty stiff before the connecters went in. I guess we could have gusseted the connecters to the floorpans but that seemed un-necessary given that a cage was going in. The 45* downbars coming off the main hoop are welded into the frame connecters, which are welded front and back to their respective subframes....

The front and rear bars are also attached to the subframes, so this thing is really tied in (tiangulated) together. There is no welding to the floorpans....everything is bolted in with plates. Welding in the baseplates actually weakens the floorpan area and the plates don't need to be welded as per the rules. In fact, up until recently, the bars had to be bolted in, but the nhra is allowing them to be welded in now.

My buddy in Detroit has a 69rt/se with a 496 e-head stroker and the same frame connecters as mine (welded in/non gusseted). I've been in his car and it's really stiff, and there's no cage (or SF gusseting) either. You can jack it up on the frame in front of the rear wheel and the front tire rises just as much as the rear....no sag ! I guess it just depends on the application, but after numerous talks with the chassis guy, we concluded that the weld in option wasn't the best route to go. He's seen some torn floorpans what had stuff welded in...the problem becomes more pronounced when the car hooks and is making good power....the sheetmetal floorpans just aren't that strong...

If you're just looking to stiffen up a weak chassis, welding into the floorpans might be the best way to go. If the car was a rattlebox before, that kind of mod could only show a huge improvement. For racing, i'm not convinced that welding the frame connecters to the pans is the right way to go....the chassis guy convinced me not to.

My take on it is that if i were building a driver that wasn't going to be raced, the frame connecters welded front and back and gusseted to the floors....is what i'd do. This would be a car with no cage either...and one that i didn't intend to run slicks on.

The current chassis setup on mine is probably overkill for a 540hp 446, but this won't be the last motor going into the car. I've got a spare block and mp 4.15 stroker crank sitting on the shelf, so a 493 is in the works. Along those lines, i've got a dana60 on order as well which we'll be installing in preperation for the next motor....i allways try to plan for the future because i hate doing and paying for things twice...don't we all !! [smilie=e:

Ron
 
Well actually I pulled the 440 and got rid of it. It had been hit on the left front and had visible wrinkles in the frame right under the firewall. I like B bodies anyway.
 
Ron: my point was that the floorpan stuff was in addition to considerable welding to the frames on either end... his setup actually had more connection to the front and rear frames than what's shown in your pics, with the additional welding to the floor more a function of the fact that they had to pass through it anyhow. The floorpans were acting in addition to what was already a very-stout setup. I'm sure you've seen the frame connectors that you have to notch the floor to install... these were similar, but home-made and almost certainly stronger. My scanner bought the farm, or I'd scan some pics I had (I'd have to find them, too) of how the setup went in; it was pretty clean as long as you didn't mind the intrusion into the rear footwells. He just bought a scrap yard of carpet from ACC and carpeted them separately after notching his existing carpet set... hard to notice them until they tripped you getting out of the car. [smilie=e:

The car we did this on was a 4-speed '71 Demon that was about as rust-free an example as you'd ever find... but the guy was also very into restoration (at least, a mostly-stock appearance) so in his mind, a cage was absolutely, positively out of the question--hence overbuilding the hell out of the frame connectors.
 
Dr.Jass said:
Ron: my point was that the floorpan stuff was in addition to considerable welding to the frames on either end.

Jass, i understand what you're talking about....i've seen that type of installation before. Comp Engineering makes a weld in style connecter like the one you're talking about.....the rear floorpans have to be channeled for the sf connecter....which sits inside the car like you described. I looked at those myself. [smilie=e:

I guess it's a case of "to each his own". Personally, i didn't want to cut the floorpans or have that sfc inside the car. Gusseting the lower hanging sfc like the one in mine would achieve the same result, inmo. Either way is fine for a streetcar, just depends how you want it to look. I'm sure that Demon is stiff as a board and drives strait as an arrow now, especially with a stick [smilie=e: A frame connecter of any kind is gonna be a huge improvement no matter what the application. I'll put a set in the 70 when the time comes and it's mainly a cruiser....

Ron
 
i bought a set of connectors from comp engineering & opted not to install them on CUDA. i didn't want to cut into the floor. (ron check that big box i gave you, thats them) i made my own which i feel work exrtemly well. they look alot like FF's except i built them into the front spring hanger.

you can get an idea of how i did mine when i installed the caltacs
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top