Not A Duster
Well-known member
giowest said:He said they are having to move the rockers out a little to get rid of some vibrations.
...and accomodate the extra doors...[smilie=i:
giowest said:He said they are having to move the rockers out a little to get rid of some vibrations.
6PK BEE said:We have heard through different engineers at work about a 'Cuda which I honestly could see happen
That would be interesting, espeaially without the Plymouth division existing anymore. :hmmm:6PK BEE said:We have heard through different engineers at work about a 'Cuda which I honestly could see happen,
mr340 said:That would be interesting, espeaially without the Plymouth division existing anymore. :hmmm:
68 is correct though. Years ago 69.5 found an article somewhere where a Sebring was spotted on a test track with 'Cuda badging. Shortly thereafter DiaperChrysler pulled the plug on Plymouth. But if it was to be based on the Sebring wouldn't that conflict with the heritage of the car since it was an A/E body and the Sebring a B? :doh:mr340 said:"Chrysler 'Cuda" Doesn't have that same ring to it...:wtf:
Me either. Only Sebrings I've seen (only 3) were 70's.Da-ho said:Ive had a couple sattelite sebrings, they were 71 and 72s. I dont think they did them before that.:hmmm:
dodgechargerfan said:That wouldn't stop them though...
Besides, the Fury was a B body before it was a C body, right?
68R/T said:Fury was always a C
Fargin HUGE is what they were. wish we was in trivia- I almost caught ye old wizened one in a boo boo but I wont mention it ever agin.68R/T said:OK, the 62-64 Fury was a B body and became a C in 65.
http://www.lhmopars.com/Body_Designations.htm
But, what were the earlier Fury's, 57 - 61 ?