Assembly Line Photos

In that next to last photo, anybody else notice that the body you can see is a buick, but the engine in the chassis right behind it is a pontiac? Maybe they were building similar cars from the 2 brands on the same line? That was well before mixing of engine and car brands began at GM.
 
In that next to last photo, anybody else notice that the body you can see is a buick, but the engine in the chassis right behind it is a pontiac? Maybe they were building similar cars from the 2 brands on the same line? That was well before mixing of engine and car brands began at GM.

Yup - wondering about that myself. If I had to guess, maybe it was a staged advertising photo, and the designer picked the elements they thought made for a better image.
 
That's a shot of a '64 Buick. The Freemont California plant produced Buick's, Pontiacs, Chevies, Oldsmobiles, and GMC trucks at that time.

Here is another angle of the same cars

64 GM Production Line.jpg

And others that show various makes coming off the line together.

64 GM Production Line 2.jpg64 GM Production Line 3.jpg64 GM Production Line 4.jpg
 
Last edited:
And a few more misc. pics.

67 Camaro Assembly Line.jpg
Chryslers - Mix - Train Transporting.jpg
Mustangs - Train Transport.jpg

Pretty crazy how they shipped Vegas on their nose. Fluids in the car. Special battery with caps off-center to keep the battery acid in, special washer fluid tank placement and a oil baffle in the engine to keep #1 cylinder from filling up with oil, and a tube from the carb to carbon canister for the fuel that drained from the carb. They developed this Vert-a-Pac system with Southern Pacific railroad to increase the number of cars on each railroad car. Used a forklift to open and close each section of the train cars.

Vegas - Train Transporting.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 63 Corvette Assembly Line.jpg
    63 Corvette Assembly Line.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 32
You don't have to like them all... just sharing because I thought some would enjoy seeing the photos.
 
No worries. I had a couple of them over the years. One had some rust in the rear quarters (lived in South Dakota). The other really didn't have any rust at all. They did have their share of issues - especially the early one. Lots of overheating and head gasket issues. Pretty fascinating production stuff though. Shipping cars on end is not something that would have crossed my mind lol
 
I was high school age when V8 Vega conversions were common. Those things were tons of fun. And not a bad looking little hot rod when done right...
 
I was high school age when V8 Vega conversions were common.

I got a ride in a vega with a 350 tri-power & 4-gear in '81. Snotty little thing. :cool:

Three weeks later his girlfriend rear-ended me with that same car. :bwuhaha: Put the vega out of commission but I drove away with a small dent in my rust-bucket '68 nova beater. :D
 
One of my high school buddy's older brother had a Vega panel wagon with a nice sounding 350 and four speed... it was a moving machine all right. I think he still owns it.
 
Pretty crazy how they shipped Vegas on their nose. Fluids in the car. Special battery with caps off-center to keep the battery acid in, special washer fluid tank placement and a oil baffle in the engine to keep #1 cylinder from filling up with oil, and a tube from the carb to carbon canister for the fuel that drained from the carb. They developed this Vert-a-Pac system with Southern Pacific railroad to increase the number of cars on each railroad car. Used a forklift to open and close each section of the train cars.

View attachment 18967

This picture relates to part of my work life. If that isn't the most ridiculous, yet ingenious method of loading vehicles onto rail cars...

The normal capacity is 10 vehicles per railcar on a bi-level, or 15 (small vehicles) on a tri-level. I count 24 or so Vega(s). Looks like a pain in the arse to load and unload though. Not sure they saved much $$, if any at all, using this method.
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top